Player-owned asset management

Build wealth.
Own the institution.

Black athletes have created generational wealth. The asset-management industry that compounds that wealth is still overwhelmingly owned somewhere else.

Black Wealth Project is building a player-owned asset management company. The first product solves one concrete problem: helping eligible investors move appreciated stock portfolios toward broad-market exposure without selling first.

Pre-launch concept. The proposed ETF has not launched. Nothing on this site is an offer to buy or sell a security or tax, legal, or investment advice.
The ownership gap

The problem isn't that diverse managers can't perform. It's that they rarely get to own the institutions.

1.4% of U.S.-based assets under management were managed by diverse-owned firms in Knight Foundation's 2021 industry research. Knight Foundation. “Diverse-owned” includes women- and racial/ethnic-minority-owned firms and is not a Black-only statistic.
One company. Two problems.

The product has to work financially. The company is about who owns it.

We are not asking investors to accept worse economics for a social mission. The first product should make sense on its own. Player ownership is why we're building the institution around it.

01 — Portfolio problem

You want a different portfolio, but selling can be expensive.

An investor may own appreciated public stocks that are more concentrated, more complicated, or simply different from what he would choose today. Selling can trigger capital-gains tax before the new portfolio even starts compounding.

02 — Ownership problem

Players are customers of financial institutions they rarely own.

NBA players collectively control substantial investable capital. That creates the opportunity to do something different: use that capital and network to help build an asset manager in which players themselves have an ownership stake.

Solve a real portfolio problem first. Use it to build a lasting institution.
Product one

Move toward the market without selling first.

We are developing a U.S. equity ETF intended to provide broad-market-like exposure. At launch, investors with qualifying appreciated portfolios could potentially contribute securities in exchange for ETF shares through a Section 351 transaction rather than liquidating those securities first.

1

You already own appreciated stocks.

Your portfolio may have significant embedded gains and may no longer be the portfolio you want to own for the next decade.

2

Selling realizes the gain.

A conventional transition means selling, paying the resulting tax, and then investing the remaining capital in the new strategy.

3

A qualifying 351 can defer recognition.

In a qualifying transaction, contributed securities are exchanged for ETF shares. The existing tax basis carries forward. The tax is deferred, not erased.

This is not a concentrated-stock escape hatch.

The contributing portfolio generally needs to already satisfy the relevant diversification test: no more than 25% in one issuer and no more than 50% in five or fewer issuers. Not every portfolio qualifies, and actual eligibility requires professional tax and legal review.

Scenario calculator

What could waiting to pay the tax change?

Start with equal return assumptions. That isolates the value of tax deferral instead of assuming the new portfolio will outperform. Then test what happens if your current portfolio trails the market-like portfolio.

$
$
%
%
%
years
These calculations happen in your browser. The portfolio values entered here are not submitted with the contact form.
Estimated tax triggered by selling today
$1.80M
In this illustration, that is capital that can remain invested at the time of a qualifying Section 351 transition. The embedded gain still exists because the original tax basis carries forward.
Illustrative after-tax value if everything is sold at the end
Keep the current portfolio $0
Sell today, pay tax, invest the remainder $0
Hypothetical qualifying 351 transition $0
351 vs. selling first $0
351 vs. keeping current portfolio $0
Equal return assumptions intentionally produce no advantage versus simply holding the current portfolio. In that case, the economic comparison is between changing the portfolio by selling today and changing it through a hypothetical qualifying tax-deferred transition. Different return assumptions are scenarios, not predictions.

This simplified illustration assumes full liquidation at the end of the selected period, uses one tax rate throughout, and excludes fees, distributions, trading effects, changes in tax law and other real-world factors.
The Black Wealth Project

The ETF is the first product. The institution is the point.

Asset management is one of the businesses through which enormous fortunes are compounded and institutions are built. Black Wealth Project starts from a simple premise: players who have already created substantial wealth should have an opportunity to own part of the infrastructure managing wealth too.

We are starting with current and former NBA players because the community has the capital, relationships, and shared experience necessary to build something together.

Join the conversation
Players already have capital. The next step is ownership. Built with players. Designed to become an institution.
Questions

The parts worth being precise about.

Does Section 351 make the capital-gains tax disappear?

No. In a qualifying transaction, gain generally is not recognized at contribution. The existing basis carries into the ETF shares, so the embedded gain remains. This is deferral, not erasure.

Can any stock portfolio qualify?

No. For a contribution of stocks and securities to avoid being treated as resulting in diversification under the relevant rules, a contributing portfolio generally needs to satisfy the 25/50 diversification test: no more than 25% in any one issuer and no more than 50% in five or fewer issuers. Other requirements also apply. Eligibility has to be determined from the actual portfolio and transaction.

Is there also an 80% requirement?

Yes. Section 351 generally requires the transferring person or group to control the corporation immediately after the exchange. The applicable definition of control uses an 80% threshold. That is one reason the launch needs to be coordinated among the contributing investors.

Is the proposed ETF trying to beat the S&P 500?

No. The concept is intentionally not based on extraordinary expected returns. The intended destination is diversified U.S. equity exposure with market-like risk and return characteristics.

Is Black Wealth Project only for Black investors?

No. The company's mission is centered on Black wealth creation and player ownership. The proposed fund is not being designed with race-based investor eligibility. Final eligibility, launch mechanics, and offering terms will be established in the fund's eventual governing and offering documents.

Can I invest in the ETF today?

No. The ETF is a pre-launch concept. We are currently speaking privately with current and former players and their representatives while we develop the company and product.

Private conversation

We're looking for the first few people, not everybody.

We're talking with a small number of current and former NBA players and people in their networks about the idea, the product, and what it would take to build a player-owned asset manager.